<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What to learn from Ivy League endowments&#8217; investment success</title>
	<atom:link href="http://investment-fiduciary.com/2009/03/18/what-to-learn-from-ivy-league-endowments-investment-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://investment-fiduciary.com/2009/03/18/what-to-learn-from-ivy-league-endowments-investment-success/</link>
	<description>Prudent Investing, Lasting Wealth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 21:02:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: investment-scientist</title>
		<link>http://investment-fiduciary.com/2009/03/18/what-to-learn-from-ivy-league-endowments-investment-success/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[investment-scientist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentscientist.com/?p=658#comment-341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree with you. They do have a lot of illiquid assets but they were not forced to sell. They could easily raise fund from other source. In fact, one of David Swensen&#039;s key insights is that liquidity is over priced. People pay a premium for it, but when they need it, it is never there. The experience last year actually confirms his insight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with you. They do have a lot of illiquid assets but they were not forced to sell. They could easily raise fund from other source. In fact, one of David Swensen&#8217;s key insights is that liquidity is over priced. People pay a premium for it, but when they need it, it is never there. The experience last year actually confirms his insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YEL</title>
		<link>http://investment-fiduciary.com/2009/03/18/what-to-learn-from-ivy-league-endowments-investment-success/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YEL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentscientist.com/?p=658#comment-340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we know now that the Yale Model did not work when the credit bubble bursted. They are being forced to sell their illiquid assets at a deep discount. Government bonds are the real diversification drivers because they have different source of return. Gov&#039;t bonds include all government issuers not just the U.S. government.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we know now that the Yale Model did not work when the credit bubble bursted. They are being forced to sell their illiquid assets at a deep discount. Government bonds are the real diversification drivers because they have different source of return. Gov&#8217;t bonds include all government issuers not just the U.S. government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

