I’ve done a lot of second opinion financial reviews over the years and these fees are broadly consistent with what I’ve seen in portfolios managed by Wall Street brokerages like Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Ameriprise etc.

In comparison, my fees are 1% for the first million, 0.7% for amounts up to $5mm and 0.4% for amounts over $5mm. Most independent RIAs (registered investment advisers) are like me – our fees are about a third of those by major brokerages.

Everything else being equal, if you are paying 1.5% more a year in fees, a back-of-the-envelope calculation will tell you that in 20 years you will be 30% poorer because of those higher fees. In 30 years, you will be 45% poorer.

But everything else is not equal. There are two other major distinctions between brokers and RIAs:

1. As RIAs, we are required by law (The Investment Adviser Act of 1940) to disclose all fees transparently, and not to receive any third party payments like commissions and kickbacks.
2. As RIAs, we are required by law to act as fiduciaries. That is we have to always put clients’ interest first.

If you currently have a broker as your “financial adviser,” you may want to use my second opinion review service to at least find out if you are paying up to your nose.

Schedule a Discovery review with me, or get my white paper for free: The Informed Investor: 5 Key Concepts for Financial Success.

Get informed about wealth building, sign up for The Investment Scientist newsletter