The Investment Scientist

Archive for the ‘wealth management’ Category

unnamed.pngA few days ago I got a question from a client.

Why don’t we move the money to T-Bills to avoid market volatility, and get back to full market exposure only when the market is on an up-trend?

It is all too human to only want to take the upside risk without the downside risk. However, study after study has shown that investors who do that usually end up hurting themselves financially.

Look at the chart. In the fifteen years between 12/31/02 and 12/31/17, missing just 10 of the best return days of the S&P 500 Index would mean that you gave up 66% of the total return during the whole period.

I conjectured that the best return days usually happened at the depth of a bear market when fear and desperation were highest and investors were quitting the market in droves. I asked my assistant Taro to look up historical data to verify that, and here is what he found: the first nine out of the ten best return days in the last fifteen years happened during the Great Recession, just as I had thought!

Read the rest of this entry »


On Dec 17th, 2017, that’s one year and some days ago, BTC (bitcoins) punched through

the $20,000 level, peaking at $20,042.91. Only twenty days earlier BTC reached $10,000 and it was during this 20-day period that I got the most intense client pressures to get their money into BTC and other cryptocurrencies. I am glad I kept them away from it, since as of today, BTC is at $3700. That’s a loss of 81.5% in a year.

BTC is not a stock since it’s not even a real business. Here’s how some stocks that were red-hot a mere few months ago have been faring …

Apple, the perennial darling of the investment world, just lost nearly 40% from its peak after today’s close. That’s a whopping $460 billion loss. The loss itself is larger than the market capitalization of all but four publicly traded companies.

Read the rest of this entry »

unnamed (2).jpg

1, I got accepted into Oxford University Business School’s Executive MBA program. I will go to Oxford to attend classes starting in January. The program requires me to go to Oxford one week out of every five for a year and a half with a total of sixteen modules.

2, I’ve nearly finished my second book “Entrepreneur Wealth Management Made Easy.” I expect to publish it in the first half of the new year.

Read the rest of this entry »

unnamed (1).jpgAs of the market close on Monday, December 17th, both the Dow and the S&P 500 have a 14% discount, the Nasdaq has a 18% discount and the small cap Russell 2000 index has a 22% discount.

On the Asian front, the Chinese market has a 27% discount, the Hong Kong market has a 22% discount, and the Japanese market has a 12% discount.

On the European front, the German market has a 21% discount, the UK market has a 14% discount, and the French market has a 15% discount.

According to my wardrobe theory of investment, this is a good time to buy stocks. If you were excited about buying stocks a few months back (when these markets were raising prices to new highs), you should be even more excited now!

(Feel free to share if you find it insightful.)

Schedule a Discovery review with me, or get my white paper for free: The Informed Investor: 5 Key Concepts for Financial Success.

wardrobe-interior-500x500.jpgInvestors are extraordinarily good at hurting themselves. They all plan to buy low and sell high, and yet what they all end up doing is buying high and selling low.

They do that by 1) piling onto the market when it is riding high and bailing when it is dropping low; 2) chasing the immediate past “winner” whether that is gold, emerging market stocks or the S&P 500 only to see the winning streak fizzle. Basically, they are systematically overpaying for assets.

If that sounds like you, well you are not alone. But here is the good news. I am going to give you a simple trick that can help correct your destructive tendency and thereby make you a much better investor.

So are you ready? Drum Roll, please …..

Treat your investment portfolio the same way you would treat your wardrobe.

What are you talking about? Are these two even comparable?

For simplicity’s sake, let say you acquire your entire wardrobe from Neiman Marcus. If Neiman Marcus has an across-the-board 50%-off sale, would you throw up your hands in despair and say,“Darn it, my entire wardrobe just lost half of its value. I better sell it all at the flea market or I will lose everything?”

Read the rest of this entry »

lead_720_405.jpgThe recent market volatility reminds me of an ancient Greek historian, Thucydides. He wrote “The History of Peloponnesian War,” about the war between the then reigning power Sparta and rising power Athen. He famously wrote: “What made war inevitable was the growth of Athenian power and the fear which this caused in Sparta.”

Fast forward to two thousand five hundred years later. A Harvard University political scientist, Professor Graham Allison coins the term “The Thucydides Trap” to describe the power dynamic between the reigning power and the rising power. Through an extensive study of historical precedents, he found there are sixteen cases where a major nation’s rise has disrupted a dominant one. Twelve of these ended in wars. For example, the rapid industrialization of Germany rattled Great Britain’s established position at the top of the pecking order, leading to the first World War.

In his book “Destined For War: Can America and China Escape the Thucydides Trap?” Allison argues that this historical metaphor is the best lens through which to observe the US-China relationship.

Read the rest of this entry »

150106094958-market-correction-1024x576.jpgAs of yesterday’s closing bell, the Nasdaq Composite is already in correction territory, down more than 12% from its high. However, the other two indices have yet to reach the correction stage, which is marked by a drop of at least 10%: the Dow is down 8.4% while the S&P 500 9.4%.

I am going to look at the recent market drop from two perspectives: statistical and economical.

Looking through the lens of statistics, a correction is long overdue. Why? Well, the historical odds of a correction are once every two years, those of a bear market once every five years. Yet the last time we had a correction was in 2011, seven years ago. Is it well-overdue?

Looking through the lens of economics, there are two exogenous economic forces that are influencing the market. One is the Trump tax cut, the other is the Trump trade war. These two forces are driving the market in opposite directions.

Read the rest of this entry »


Michael Zhuang is principal of MZ Capital, a fee-only independent advisory firm based in Washington, DC.

Twitter: @mzhuang

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.


%d bloggers like this: