The Investment Scientist

High-Yield Bonds: Higher Risks, Lower Returns

Posted on: April 21, 2011

In 1993, the Journal of Financial Economics published “Common risk factors in the returns of stocks and bonds” by Fama and French. They examined bond returns in particular through the lens of various asset return models.

Let’s look at one of those models: the Fama/French three-factor model. The regression statistics of various bond classes are summarized in the table below:

Bond class 1-5G 6-10G Aaa Aa A Baa <Baa
Alpha 0.72% 0.84% -0.84% -0.85% -0.96% -0.6% -1.32%
Beta 0.1 0.18 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.34
S -0.06 -0.14 -0.12 -0.11 -0.09 -0.04 0.04
V 0.07 0.08 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.2 0.23

Explanation of the table

1-5G denotes Treasuries with less than 5 years to maturity, and 6-10G denotes Treasuries with 6 to 10 years to maturity. “Aaa” and the others letter combinations simply denote bond classes of a given credit rating; <Baa is commonly called high yield bonds.

The three factors are market risk (Beta) factor, small cap risk (S) factor, and value risk (V) factor. The table sums up each bond class’ exposure of Beta, S and V risks.

What we learn from the table?

  1. Higher yielding (lower credit quality) bonds have lower risk adjusted returns. (Alpha row)
  2. Higher yielding (lower credit quality) bonds have more exposure to the market risk factor; therefore, they are more correlated with the S&P 500. (Beta row)
  3. Government bonds have negative correlation with the small cap risk factor. (S row)
  4. Higher yielding (lower credit quality) bonds have higher correlation with the value risk factor. (V row)

Application to portfolio construction

High-yield bonds have negative alpha and strongly positive beta. Their inclusion in a portfolio could actually result in lower portfolio returns and higher portfolio risk. On the other hand, government bonds have negative exposure to the small cap risk factor and small exposure to the value risk factors. Inclusion of government bonds and small cap value stocks would result in higher returns and lower portfolio risk.

It is tempting to add high yield bonds to the portfolio mix. However, their effect should not be considered outside of the context of the portfolio mix and risk adjusted returns. Judging from academic research and practical evidence, it is not a smart decision to include high yield bonds in your portfolio.

Click to get The Informed Investor: 5 Key Concepts for Financial Success.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Author

Michael Zhuang is principal of MZ Capital, a fee-only independent advisory firm based in Washington, DC. He is also a regular contributor to Morningstar Advisor and Physicians Practice. To explore a long-term wealth advisory relationship, schedule a discovery meeting (phone call) with him.



You may also get his monthly newsletter, or join his Facebook page for regular wealth management insights. Michael's email is info[at]mzcap.com.

Twitter: @mzhuang

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

%d bloggers like this: